Agentic AI Use cases

Period-end accruals proposed from open orders and receipts, and posted with their basis.

Juno would calculate period-end accruals from open purchase orders, goods receipts awaiting invoices, service entries and confirmations from budget owners, apply the accrual policy, propose each entry with its basis, post approved entries with automatic reversal and true them up against the invoices that follow.

FROM THE LAST RECEIPT RUN TO THE TRUE-UP, AS DESIGNED01After the lastreceipt runopen lines, receipts,entries, invoice status,in place02Proposed withbasisthe receipt, the PO price,the rule, the sum03Thin evidenceaskeda request with a clock tothe owner or the buyer04Approved by namethe batch, by supplier andcost centre05Posted, reversed,trued updocument numbers; reversalon day 1; invoicescompareddesigned, yet to be built · showcase estate
Five steps, as the blueprint designs them. Everything on this page is a design, yet to be built; the values are the showcase estate’s.
2nd
most time-consuming close activity, behind account reconciliation
Ledge · 2025
80%
less time on accruals, and up to three days faster to close, at early adopters of one close suite
BlackLine · 11 August 2026
Q1 2027
general availability scheduled for SAP’s accounting accruals agent, after restricted availability
SAPinsider · 17 September 2026
8
designed roles this use case would draw on, from calculation to true-up
blueprint · designed, yet to be built
A moment in the day

The last working day on the showcase estate, as the blueprint designs it

JH
Last working day · 17:30 · the finance floor · showcase estate

It is the last working day of September, 17:30, and the final goods-receipt run at plant 1210 has finished. The agent has read 1,318 open purchase order lines and found 386 receipts awaiting invoices worth $2.14 million, among them 112 lines of material 7741-X from Brightline Metals SA received on the 27th. It proposes 386 accruals at the purchase order price and 14 service accruals from confirmed service entries.

Six service lines above $25,000 stand apart: Corvid Plastics has yet to send a service entry for them, so the policy holds the proposals and puts a confirmation request in D. Okafor’s queue with a 09:00 clock. J. Harrison, finance lead, reviews the batch summary by supplier and by cost centre, edits one freight estimate that the last three invoices show as high, and approves.

S/4HANA answers with 400 document numbers, each with the reversal date set to the first of October. On workday 1 the six held lines come back with D. Okafor’s quantities and post the same way; in October, as the invoices arrive, the true-up run compares each accrued amount with the invoiced one and stores the difference against the supplier.

Why this is a top use case

What the market is doing, with the evidence

Accruals and provisions rank second among the most time-consuming close activities, behind account reconciliation (Ledge, 2025) 8, and 2026 is the year the ERP vendors shipped purpose-built accrual agents. SAP’s Joule Accounting Accruals Agent reads the accrual policy, the open purchase orders and the receipts awaiting invoices, proposes each accrual with the rule and the calculation, and lets accountants accept, change or reject it before posting; general availability is scheduled for Q1 2027 (SAPinsider, 17 September 2026) 13.

BlackLine’s Verity Accruals early customers close up to three days faster and spend 80% less time on accruals (BlackLine, 11 August 2026) 26; the product asks business partners to confirm unbilled services and prepares the journals for approval 30. SAP’s Financial Closing Assistant orchestrates posting, accruals and journal validation from Q2 2026 (SAP, May 2026) 14; HighRadius lists purchase order and vendor expense accrual agents 39; Workday’s Accounting Agent prepares accruals continuously 33; FloQast’s reconciliation agent handles purchase order accruals 36.

A goods-receipt clearing account can accumulate thousands of open items a month, and one specialist agent classifies them by root cause and clears timing differences inside tolerance, on a single source (Symphony, 14 October 2025) 55. Adoption surveys rarely isolate accruals, which keeps the use case below the first two. For a manufacturer its weight is elsewhere: the accrual is the purchase order line, the receipt and the invoice status read together, the same rows the PO cancellation agent reads each morning.

By hand today

How it is done today

On the last working day and workday 1 a general ledger accountant runs the open purchase order and goods-receipt reports in the ERP, exports them and removes the lines already invoiced. For services with a receipt document missing (contractors, consultants, utilities, freight, subcontract work) the accountant e-mails cost-centre owners and buyers for what was consumed, waits, and estimates where the replies are late.

Amounts are grouped by account and cost centre in a spreadsheet, checked against the accrual policy’s thresholds and exclusions, and a journal with automatic reversal is prepared and approved by the controller. Next period the reversal posts and the invoices arrive; the true-up is checked, if at all, when the flux review asks why an expense line moved.

One to three days of the close go to the accountant, with the confirmation chase the slowest part. In the showcase estate the acquired division runs its purchasing and payables on Oracle Fusion, so the reports come from two ERPs and are joined by hand.

Today

Last working day to workday 2, by hand

  • Run and export the open purchase order and goods-receipt reports from each ERP; remove invoiced lines
  • E-mail cost-centre owners and buyers about services; wait; estimate where replies are late
  • Group by account and cost centre in a spreadsheet; check the policy thresholds
  • Prepare the reversing journal; the controller approves; the true-up is checked when the flux review asks
1 to 3 daysof the close; the chase is the slowest part
As designed

The run, the queue, the true-up

  • The run after the final goods-receipt run would read both ERPs and the supplier portal in place
  • Receipts would accrue at the purchase order price under the rule; services from confirmed entries
  • Thin evidence would become a confirmation request with a clock, in the owner’s queue
  • The batch is approved by name; the reversal date is set; the true-up runs as the invoices arrive
workday 1batch approved; the true-up by supplier in the next period

Left: the last working day and workday 1 as the note describes them. Right: the designed path, with the same people confirming and approving. Showcase estate.

Stage by stage

How Juno would enable it, stage by stage

The six stages carry this use case’s objects, questions, terms, trigger and measure. Everything below is a design, and the supply chain half of it needs the fewest new parts: purchase order, purchase order line, goods receipt, supplier and material are objects the ontology already holds; open item, accrual proposal and cost centre would be added as a finance extension.

01
Register
Purchase orders with their lines and schedule lines, goods receipts, service entry sheets, supplier invoices and their status, clearing-account items, subcontract and consigned stock movements and cost centres with their owners would be registered from SAP S/4HANA (materials management, payables, universal journal), Oracle Fusion for the acquired division, the supplier portal for invoice and confirmation status and the warehouse system for receipt confirmation. The rows stay where they are.
02
Map
The purchase order line, the goods receipt, the supplier and the material are ontology objects already; the mapping links the receipt in materials management to the clearing item in the ledger and to the invoice status in the portal, across both ERPs. A finance extension would add open item, accrual proposal, cost centre and owner. One meaning of “receipt awaiting invoice” is what this stage pays for.
03
Ask
“Which receipts at plant 1210 are awaiting an invoice at period end, and what are they worth by supplier?” and “Which service accruals from last quarter came in more than 10% above the invoice?” Each answer would show the query across the ERPs and the portal, with the asking person’s access applied.
04
Teach
The team would add its accrual policy names, its service categories (freight, subcontract, contractors, utilities), the phrase “open GR” as the floor says it, and the supplier portal’s status words for an invoice in transit, so the proposals and the questions read in the estate’s own words.
05
Act
Trigger: after the final goods-receipt run on the last working day, on workday 1, and as invoices post. Policy: “Accrue each receipt awaiting an invoice at the purchase order price and each confirmed service entry; above $25,000 with the entry missing, ask the owner and hold until the answer or the clock runs out.” Actions: post the batch with its reversal date, send the request, post the true-up. Level A2; the ERP’s document numbers confirm the batch.
06
Learn
The measure that improves is the true-up variance: accrued against invoiced, by supplier and cost centre. Every edit to a proposed amount and every true-up difference would be stored with the rule version, and Juno would propose changes to the estimation rule for the service categories that miss most, as a new version for J. Harrison to release.
LAST WORKING DAY · 17:30WORKDAY 1 · 09:00WORKDAY 1 TO 2OCTOBERThe agentD. Okafor ·buyerJ. Harrison ·finance leadSAP S/4HANAReads open lines1,318 lines · 386receipts · 14 servicesHolds six linesservices above $25,000· entry missingConfirmsthe six quantities ·workday 1 · 08:40Approves thebatchone freight edit400 documentsbackreversal 1 OctoberRuns the true-upaccrued againstinvoiceda request with a 09:00 clocksix lines confirmedposted with the reversal datedocument numbers kept
The scene as four lanes: the agent, the buyer, the finance lead and the ERP, from the last working day to the true-up in October. Designed, yet to be built; showcase estate.
Who does what

Who would do what, at the designed level

The agent A3 Delegated
  • Reads the open purchase order lines, receipts, service entries and invoice status in place after the final goods-receipt run
  • Proposes each accrual with its basis: the receipt, the purchase order price, the rule applied and the calculation
  • Posts receipt-based accruals under the rule with the reversal date set; holds thin evidence behind a confirmation request with a clock
  • Runs the true-up as invoices arrive and stores the difference by supplier and cost centre
a proposal with its basis; a confirmation, an edit or an approval back
The person
  • The cost-centre owner or the buyer confirms services received and receipt quantities where the evidence is thin, inside the clock
  • The general ledger accountant accepts, edits or rejects each service accrual with its basis on show
  • J. Harrison approves the batch above the value threshold and any exception to the policy
  • Internal audit reads the trail from proposal to invoice and true-up on a sample each quarter

The market runs accruals as draft-and-approve: SAP’s agent proposes and accountants accept, change or reject before posting 13; BlackLine flags uncertainties for final review 30; FloQast keeps a person in the review 36. The blueprint designs accrual calculation and posting at A3: receipts with a purchase order price would post under the rule, and estimates and services would wait for a person. A first release would run the whole batch at A2; receipt-based accruals would move to A3 once three closes of recorded cases pass.

What you would configure

The settings you would make

Agent settings · Accruals for goods and services received
ElementSettingSet byChanges
ObjectiveAccrue every receipt awaiting an invoice and every confirmed service at period end; propose with basis; true up against the invoiceJ. Harrison, finance leadNew version
Data scopePurchase order lines, receipts, service entries, invoice status, clearing items and cost centres in SAP S/4HANA, the Oracle Fusion division and the supplier portalA. Novak, data leadNew version
RulesThe accrual policy and its planning table: receipts at the purchase order price; services from confirmed entries; above $25,000 unconfirmed, ask and holdJ. Harrison with the Planner AgentNew version, simulated first
TriggerLast working day after the final goods-receipt run · workday 1 before payables closes · reversal on day 1 · true-up as invoices post · on demandJ. Harrison, finance leadAt once
Actions permittedPost an accrual batch with the reversal date · send a confirmation request · post a true-up journal · clear a clearing itemJ. Harrison, ownerNew version
LimitsService threshold $25,000 · batch approval above $500,000 · confidence floor 0.85 · one accrual per receipt, checked for duplicatesJ. Harrison with the CFONew version
EscalationA confirmation clock that runs out, to the cost-centre owner’s manager and then J. Harrison · a failed posting, to the ownerJ. Harrison, ownerAt once
LevelA2 Supervised with the general ledger accountant as named approver and J. Harrison on the batch; A3 for receipt-based accruals once three closes passThe CFOUp on evidence, down in one step
FeedbackEvery edit to a proposed amount and every true-up difference is recorded and usedAlways onFixed

Every row is a setting or a versioned rule; the level and the limits are the ones a manager signs.

Built from the blueprint

The roles this use case would draw on

Lima’s agent blueprint is a design of 960 agent roles across five end-to-end chains. It is the map of what Juno can be configured to do, and the first agents are built from it one at a time, the way the PO cancellation agent was.

Blueprint · designed, yet to be builtThese roles are designed on the map. Each is configured from the same parts.
Close 5 roles
Accrual calculation & posting A3
Accrual release & true-up A3
Provision adequacy analytics A3
Subcontract & consigned stock A3
Employee & incentive accruals A3
Transact 3 roles
IC accrual & cut-off control A3
Journal creation & posting A3
Recurring & template journals A4

Additional capability in Record-to-Report lists the rest of the map for this chain.

How it is measured

The measures that show it working

Measure
accrual preparation time (adopters: 80% less)
days to close (adopters: up to three days faster; baseline 57% at seven days or more)
true-up variance: accrued against invoiced by supplier and cost centre
share of accruals proposed under the rule against estimated by hand
missed and duplicate accruals found after close
open clearing items over 60 days by supplier

Baseline the true-up variance first, because it is the measure the estate already produces and the one the rule would be tuned on: for the last three closes, compare each accrued amount with the invoice that followed, by supplier and by service category. It shows at once which estimates are guesswork and which are purchase order prices, and it is the test the simulation runs before release.

Terms on this page
Receipt awaiting invoiceA goods receipt posted in materials management for which the supplier’s invoice has yet to arrive; the open item on the clearing account.
Accrual with automatic reversalA period-end entry that posts the cost now and reverses on the first day of the next period, when the invoice takes its place.
Service entry sheetThe record that a service was received; the receipt document for services.
True-upThe check of each accrued amount against the invoice that followed, and the entry that corrects the difference.
Confirmation requestA question with a clock sent to the cost-centre owner or the buyer when the evidence for an accrual is thin.
Questions
Why does this use case matter more for a manufacturer?

Most of the accrual is receipts against purchase orders, read from materials management and the supplier portal, the same rows the purchasing agents read. One meaning of a purchase order line serves the buyer and the accountant alike.

What would post under the rule at A3?

Receipts with a purchase order price and confirmed service entries, inside the limits. Estimates, services above the threshold with an entry missing, and any exception to the policy would wait for a person.

Would the agent e-mail our suppliers?

It would ask your own cost-centre owners and buyers, through a SmartApp queue or e-mail, with a clock. Suppliers are read through the portal for invoice status.

Next in this chain
The question this leaves

The accruals are posted and the trial balance freezes on workday 3. Now the executive committee asks why cost of sales at plant 1210 moved 8%. Who writes that answer, and from what?

Answered next

Flux analysis and variance commentary

Every material movement drilled to its transactions and the supply chain events behind it, drafted in the company’s words and confirmed by its owner.

Sources

Dated sources used on this page

  1. [8] Ledge, The state of month-end close in 2025: finance team benchmarks & insights, 2025 (undated page) (checked 23 September 2026) · https://www.ledge.co/content/month-end-close-benchmarks-for-2025
  2. [13] SAPinsider, SAP Releases Accounting Accruals Agent for Month-End Close, 17 September 2026 (checked 23 September 2026) · https://sapinsider.org/blogs/sap-releases-accounting-accruals-agent-for-month-end-close/
  3. [14] SAP, SAP Sapphire Innovation News Guide 2026, May 2026 (undated page) (checked 23 September 2026) · https://www.sap.com/topics/events/sapphire/innovation-news-guide-2026
  4. [26] The Motley Fool, BlackLine (BL) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript, 11 August 2026 (checked 23 September 2026) · https://www.fool.com/earnings/call-transcripts/2026/08/11/blackline-bl-q2-2026-earnings-call-transcript/
  5. [30] BlackLine, BlackLine Verity Accruals, undated (checked 23 September 2026) · https://www.blackline.com/products/financial-close/verity-accruals/
  6. [33] Workday, Accounting AI Agent, undated (checked 23 September 2026) · https://www.workday.com/en-us/artificial-intelligence/ai-agents/accounting.html
  7. [36] FloQast, FloQast Unveils AI Agent Builder and Expanded AI Capabilities to Redefine the Future of Accounting, 17 September 2025 (checked 23 September 2026) · https://www.floqast.com/press-releases/floqast-unveils-ai-agent-builder-and-expanded-ai-capabilities-to-redefine-the-future-of-accounting
  8. [39] HighRadius, Financial Close Management Software, undated (checked 23 September 2026) · https://www.highradius.com/software/financial-close-and-reconciliation-software/financial-close-management/
  9. [55] Symphony, GR/IR Reconciliation: From Manual Struggle to Intelligent Governance, 14 October 2025 (checked 23 September 2026) · https://www.runsymphony.com/blog/grir-intelligent-governance/

See Juno answer and act on your own data

Bring two systems and one decision your planners make every week. In the first week we register the data, confirm the mapping with your team, answer your questions in ChatLima and run the first agent at the level you choose.